Page 95 - Ethel D. Hume - Bešam ili Paster: Izgubljeno poglavlje u istoriji biologije
P. 95

BE CHAMP OR PASTEUR?
       92
       structured and to be the builders of cells; and Bechamp
       saw that if this were true, Virchow's theory of the cell as
       the unit of life would be shattered completely. The granu-
       lations, the  "little bodies," would be the anatomical
       elements, and those found in the limestone and chalk he
       believed might even be the living remains of animal and
       vegetable forms of past ages.  These must be the up-
       builders of plant and animal bodies and these might sur-
       vive when such corporate bodies have long since under-
       gone disruption.
         At this point we may draw attention to the cautiousness
       of Bechamp's proceedings. Although his investigations of
       chalk were commenced at the time of the publication of
       his Beacon Memoir, he continued to work at the subject
       for nearly ten years before giving publicity to his new
       observations. Meanwhile, the proverb about the ill wind
       was exemplified in his case, for diseases affecting vines
       were becoming the scourge of France, and led him to
       undertake some experiments that were helpful in widening
       the new views that he was gradually formulating.
         We have already seen how in 1863 M. Pasteur had been
       despatched with the Emperor's blessing to investigate the
       troubles of French wine-growers.  There was no official
       request for Professor Bechamp's assistance, but, none the
       less, with his unfailing interest in all scientific problems,
       he started to probe into the matter, and in 1862, a year
       before Pasteur, began his researches in the vineyard.
         He exposed to contact with air, at the same time and
       place  (1) grape-must, decolourised by animal charcoal,
           grape-must, simply filtered, and  grape-must, not
       (2)                               (3)
       filtered.  The three preparations fermented, but to a
       degree in an inverse order from the above enumeration.
       Further, the moulds, or ferments, that developed were not
       identical in the three experiments.
         The question thus arose: "Why, the chemical medium
       being the same in the three cases, did it not act in the
       same manner upon the three musts?"
         To solve the riddle, the Professor instituted more experi-
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100