Page 91 - Ethel D. Hume - Bešam ili Paster: Izgubljeno poglavlje u istoriji biologije
P. 91

88          BfiGHAMP OR PASTEUR?
         fibres and other anatomical elements of the body, and in
         great abundance in tuberculous substances and other
         disease matters.
           Bechamp, always so careful to avoid unsubstantiated
         conclusions, did not allow his imagination to run away in
         regard to them.   He at  first merely noted them and
         bestowed upon them the noncommittal name of "little
         bodies." He had no further enlightenment in regard to
         them at the time when his new duties took him to Mont-
         pellier and he there brought to a close the observations
         that he had commenced at Strasbourg and which he
         recounted and explained in his Memoir of 1857.
           It will be remembered that for many of these experi-
         ments, the Professor employed various  salts, including
         potassium carbonate, in the presence ofwhich the inversion
         of cane-sugar did not take place, in spite of the absence of
         creosote. Another experiment that he made was to sub-
         stitute for potassium carbonate, calcium carbonate in the
         form of chalk. Great was his surprise to find that in spite
         of the addition of creosote, to prevent the intrusion of
         atmospheric germs, cane-sugar none the less underwent
         inversion, or change of some sort.  In regard to creosote,
         Bechamp had already proved that though it was a pre-
         ventive against the invasion of extraneous organisms, it
         had no effect in hampering the development of moulds
         that were already established in the medium. The experi-
         ments in which he had included chalk seemed, however,
         to contradict this conclusion, for in these cases, creosote
         proved incapable of preventing the inversion of sugar. He
         could only believe that the contradiction arose from some
         faultiness of procedure; so he determined to probe further
         into the mystery and meanwhile to omit from his Memoir
         any reference to the experiments in which chalk had
         proved a disturbing factor.
           The work that Professor Bechamp undertook in this
         connection is an object lesson in painstaking research. To
         begin with, he had, first, chalk and, afterwards, a block of
         limestone conveyed to his laboratory with great precau-
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96