Page 148 - Ethel D. Hume - Bešam ili Paster: Izgubljeno poglavlje u istoriji biologije
P. 148

A PLAGIARISM FRUSTRATED                  145

     vibrios are there, nor on the outside, because the vapours
     of the alcohol prevent the development of germs on the
     surface; but I observed that the meat became tainted in a
     pronounced degree, if small in quantity, and gangrenous, if
     the meat were in considerable mass."
       Pasteur's object was to show that there were no inherent
     living elements in meat, that if external life, the germs of
     the air, were quite excluded, there would be no bacterial
     development from inner organisms. These were the days
     in which, having  enthusiastically adopted Bechamp's
     ideas of the important parts played by the atmospheric
     hosts, he denied equally vociferously any inherent living
     elements in animal and vegetable bodies.
       Bechamp, knowing how his own skill with the micro-
     scope outstripped that of all his contemporaries, excused
     Pasteur for not having been able to detect the minute
     organisms in the depth of the fleshy substance.  But he
     maintained that Pasteur's own acknowledgment of the
     tainted or gangrenous state of the meat should have been
     sufficient  to have convinced him of the  reality of a
     chemical change and its correlative necessity—a causative
     agent. Bechamp claimed that Pasteur's own experiments,
     while attempting to deny, on the contrary, proved the
     truth of the microzymian contentions.
       For instance, again, in an experiment on boiled milk,
     Pasteur observed a smell resembling tallow and noted the
     separation of the fatty matter in the form of clots. If there
     were nothing living in the milk, how could he account for
     the change in its odour and explain the cause ofthe clotting?
       Thus it is impossible to set aside the marked contrast
     between Bechamp and Pasteur in regard to their attention
     to any phenomenon, since by the former nothing was ever
    ignored, while the latter constantly passed over most
    contradictory evidence.  In spite, for example, of all the
     marked changes in milk, Pasteur was content to describe
    it as unalterable, except through access of germs of the air,
     and nothing else than a solution of mineral salts, of milk-
    sugar and of casein in which were suspended particles of
   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153