Page 143 - Ethel D. Hume - Bešam ili Paster: Izgubljeno poglavlje u istoriji biologije
P. 143

140         BfiCHAMP OR PASTEUR?
        to follow his restricted ideas of micro-organisms, and,
        during the sixties, one of them, M. Davaine, more or less
        inaugurated what is now known as the germ-theory of
        disease.
          It came about in this way. A complaint called charbon or
        splenic  fever,  and,  later, more commonly known  as
        anthrax, made occasional ravages among the herds of
        cattle and flocks of sheep in France and other parts of
        Europe.  In 1838, a Frenchman named Delafond drew
        attention to appearances like little rods in the blood of
        affected animals, and these were afterwards recognised
        by Davaine and others. A theory had already been put for-
        ward in the past by Kircher, Linne, Raspail and others
        that special organisms might induce disease, and Davaine,
       becoming acquainted with Pasteur's idea that each kind of
       fermentation is produced by a specific germ of the air,
        now suggested that the little rod-like organisms, which he
        called bacteridia, might be parasitic invaders of animal
        bodies and the cause of splenic fever, otherwise anthrax.
        He and others, who tried to investigate the subject, met
       with contradictory results in their experiments.  It was
       later, in 1878, that the German doctor, Robert Koch,
       came to their rescue by cultivating the bacteridia and dis-
       covering a formation of spores among them; while Pasteur
       finally took the matter up and with his fondness for dog-
                         —
       matising declared  1 :  "Anthrax is, therefore, the disease of
       the bacteridium,  as  trichinosis  is  the  disease  of the
       trichina, as itch is the disease of its special acarus."
         Generalisations are always dangerous in a world of con-
       tradictions; but as  it has been truly said, "there  is no
       doctrine so false that it does not contain some particle of
       truth."  This wise saying has been quoted by Bechamp,  2
                     —
       who goes on:    "It  is thus with microbian  doctrines.
       Indeed,  if in the eyes of a certain number of savants,
       doctors and surgeons, the system of pre-existing morbid
       germs were denuded of every appearance of truth and did

         1
          The Life of Pasteur, by Ren£ Vallery-Radot, p. 260.
         2
          La Thiorie du Microzyma, p. 37.
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148