Page 144 - Ethel D. Hume - Bešam ili Paster: Izgubljeno poglavlje u istoriji biologije
P. 144

NATURE'S EXPERIMENTS                  141

     not seem established on any experimental   reality,  its
     reception by these savants, who seem to me to have adopted
     it without going sufficiently deeply into it, would have been
     absolutely incomprehensible.  Incontestable facts, how-
     ever, seem to support it. Thus, it is certain that there truly
     exist microscopic  living beings of the most  exquisite
     minuteness, which, undoubtedly, can communicate the
     specific diseased condition that is in them. The cause both
     of the virulence and the power of infection in certain pro-
     ducts of the sick organism, or of bodies in a state of putre-
     faction after death, resides in reality in beings of this order.
     It is true that people have certainly discovered such beings
     during the development of certain complaints, virulent,
     infectious, contagious or otherwise."
       It is thus seen that  it was Bechamp's belief that it is
     this particle oftruth in the germ-theory that has blinded so
     many to its errors. He explains that the want of a fuller
     understanding  is brought about by lack of sufficient
     knowledge.
       14  'In my eyes, it is because doctors have perceived no
     relation, no connecting link, between certain histological
     elements of the animal and vegetable organism and
     bacteria that they have so lightly abandoned the laws of
     the great science to adopt after Davaine, and with Pasteur,
     Kircher's system of pre-existing disease-germs.  Thus it
     comes about that not understanding the real and essential
     correlation  existing between bacteria and the normal
     histological elements of our organisation, like Davaine, or
     denying it, like Pasteur, they have come newly again to
     believe in the system of P. Kircher. Long before Davaine
     made his observations and considered the inside of the
     organism to be a medium for development of inoculated
                         —
     bacteria, Raspail said:  'The organism does not engender
     disease:  it receives  it from without.  .  .  . Disease  is an
      effect ofwhich the active cause is external to the organism.'
      In spite of this, the great physicians affirm, in Pidoux'
                  —
      happy words:  'Disease is born of us and in us.' But M.
       1
        La Thiorie du Microzyma, p. 38.
   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149