Page 83 - Ethel D. Hume - Bešam ili Paster: Izgubljeno poglavlje u istoriji biologije
P. 83

8o          BfiCHAMP OR PASTEUR?
        barrel. He looked upon muscle, milk, blood and so forth
        as mere mixtures of chemical proximate principles. He
        did, it is true, draw some distinction between the interior
        of an organism and that of a barrel of beer, or a cask of
                                                  1
        wine, for we find that he said that the first is "endowed
        with powers of transformation that boiling destroys"
        ("vertus de transformation que V ebullition detruit"). Bechamp
        here shows how Pasteur's mind reverted to the old-
        fashioned belief in spontaneous alteration.  Recognising
        nothing inherently alive in the composition of animal and
        vegetable bodies, it was his aim to show that meat, milk,
        blood,  etc., would remain unchanged    if completely
        secured from invasion by aerial organisms. And when,
        later on, he copied an experiment that Bechamp had
        undertaken on meat, and found, in his own observation,
        that, in spite of precautions against germs of the air, the
        muscular masses of the meat yet became tainted, he was
        driven to fall back for an explanation upon vague, occult
        "powers of transformation."
          In the same way, for the wonderful evolution of an egg
        into a bird, he had no solution except these same mysterious
        transformatory powers. How can it be said that he had
        destroyed  belief in spontaneous  generation, when he
        could only ascribe to a spontaneous change the amazing
        development of, for instance, the cells of an egg to a
        circulatory apparatus, bony and nervous systems, glands,
        organs, and finally a bird covered with feathers?  For a
        spontaneous change there must be if the substance of an
        egg is only a chemical mixture of the same order as wine or
        beer. What are Pasteur's "powers of transformation," if
        not the same as Bonnet's "excellent modification," which
        produces the organisation of matter, or if not the same as
        the "nisusformativus" or productive forces, vegetable and
        plastic, with which Needham, and, later Pouchet, the
        believers in spontaneous generation, were  satisfied  to
        explain the phenomenon? Pasteur appears merely to have
        provided fresh words in place of other words.
          1
           Les Microzymas t p. 399.
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88