Page 81 - Ethel D. Hume - Bešam ili Paster: Izgubljeno poglavlje u istoriji biologije
P. 81

BfiCHAMP OR PASTEUR?
       78
       a part ofthe materials ofthe yeast, and that it (the alcohol)
       is something like a product of excretion."
         It seems strange that scientists should have required the
       following simple physiological explanation from Professor
       Bechamp:
         1C 4
           Suppose an adult man to have lived a century, to
       weigh on an average 60 kilogrammes; he will have con-
       sumed in that time, besides other foods, the equivalent of
       20,000 kilogrammes of flesh and produced about 800
       kilogrammes of urea.  Shall it be said that it is impossible
       to admit that this mass of flesh and of urea could at any
       moment of his life form part of his being? Just as a man
       consumes all that food only by repeating the same act a
       great many times, the yeast cell consumes the great mass of
       sugar only by constantly assimilating and disassimilating
       it bit by bit. Now, that which only one man will consume
       in a century, a sufficient number ofmen would absorb and
       form in a day.  It is the same with the yeast; the sugar that
       a small number of cells would only consume in a year, a
       greater number would destroy in a day; in both cases, the
       more numerous the individuals, the more rapid the con-
       sumption."
         By the need of such an explanation evidence is given
       that Pasteur had failed to understand fermentation to be
       due to physiological processes of absorption and excretion.
       It would take too long to follow the varying examples that
       substantiate  this  criticism,  and,  naturally,  difficult
       scientific intricacies were beyond the comprehension of
       the general public, a great part of whom, having no idea
       of the processes required for the food they put into their
       own bodies, were still far less likely even dimly to fathom
       the  nutritive  functions  of organisms  invisible  except
       through the microscope!  It was nothing to them that,
       among the learned Reports of the Academy of Science,
       treaties were to be found, by a Professor working at
       Montpellier, that clearly explained the why and the
       wherefore of the intricate chemical changes that go by the
         1
          Comptes Rendus de VAcadSmie des Sciences 75, p. 1523.
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86