Page 67 - Ethel D. Hume - Bešam ili Paster: Izgubljeno poglavlje u istoriji biologije
P. 67

BfiCHAMP OR PASTEUR?
        6 4
        pletely  opposite  standpoint, and  ascribed  almost  all
        phenomena to the influence of atmospheric germs.
          His immediate opponent, meanwhile, experimented on
        air on mountains, on plains, on the sea, and, as everybody
        knows, Pasteur never succeeded in convincing M. Pou-
         chet.
                                                          1—
           Of these Pasteurian experiments, Bechamp writes:
         "From his microscopic analysis, he comes to conclusions,
        like Pouchet, without precision (sans rien preciser) ; there are
        organised corpuscles in the collected dust, only he cannot
        say "this is an egg, that is a spore," but he affirms that
        there are a sufficient number to explain all the cases of the
        generation of infusoria. Pasteur thus took up the position
        of explaining by germs of the air all that he had explained
        before by spontaneous generation."
          He was naturally entitled to hold any opinions that he
        chose, whether they were superficial or otherwise, and also
        to change his opinions, but we think all will agree that
        what he was not entitled to do was to claim for himself
        discoveries initiated by another worker.  Yet, in a dis-
        cussion on spontaneous generation, which took place at
        the Sorbonne, during a Meeting, on the 22nd Nov., 1861,
        of the Societes Savantes, Pasteur, actually in the presence of
        Professor Bechamp, took to himself the credit of the proof
        of the appearance of living organisms in a medium devoid
        of albuminoid matter. The Professor, with that distaste for
        self-advertisement, which so often accompanies the highest
        intellectuality, listened in amazed silence, until his own
        turn came, when, instead ofputting forward the legitimate
        seniority of his work, he merely gave an account of the
        experiments described in his great Memoir and the con-
        clusions that had resulted from them. On returning to his
        seat, which happened to be next to Pasteur's, he asked the
        latter to be so kind as to admit his knowledge of the work
        that had just been under description. The Report of the
        Meeting tells us of Pasteur's method of compliance. 2
          1
           Les Grands Problemes Midicaux, par A. Bkhamp, p. 13.
          2
           Revues des Sociitts Savantes I, p. 81 (1862).
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72