Page 44 - Ethel D. Hume - Bešam ili Paster: Izgubljeno poglavlje u istoriji biologije
P. 44

PASTEUR'S MEMOIRS OF 1857                  41
     tion ofa dead organism  ; or by the conversion into globules
     of its soluble part, whatever that may mean; or by spon-
     taneous  alteration?  No wonder that Bechamp com-
     ments 1 : "Pasteur's experiments were so haphazard that
     he, who acknowledged with Cagniard de Latour the fact
     of the organisation and life of yeast, boiled this living being
     to study its soluble part!"  Indeed, Bechamp's account of
     Liebig's and Pasteur's closely allied work is well worth
     perusal from p. 56 to p. 65 ofLes Grands Problemes Medicaux.
       The chief point to be noted is that as Pasteur made use
     for these experiments of substances with life in them, such
     as yeast broth, etc., they could not, in any case, furnish
     evidence as to the foremost question at stake, namely,
     whether life could ever arise in a purely chemical medium.
     That problem was never so much as touched upon by
     Pasteur in  1857.  If we had only his explanation of
     fermentation, made during that year, we should indeed
     ^ave a strange idea ofthe phenomenon. We should believe
     in the spontaneous generation of alcoholic, lactic and other
     ferments. We should be puzzled to understand how fer-
     mentation could be a vital act and yet be effected by dead
     organisms. Of the air-borne origin of ferments we should
     not have an inkling, that is, so far as Pasteur was con-
     cerned, for, either, he was ignorant of, or else, he ignored
     the truth already propounded by others, particularly by
     Schwann, the German.   Pasteur passed over with slight
     allusion the contacts with air that" were involved in his
     experiments, because his aim was to disprove Liebig's
     theory that the alteration of yeast broth was due to an
     oxidation by air and he seems to have had no idea of the
     important part that air might play, although for a very
     different reason from the one imagined by Liebig.
       Clearly, in 1857, Pasteur was a Sponteparist, without,
     however, shedding light upon the controversy. The house-
     wife, puzzled by the souring of milk, could only have
     learned from him that living globules had put in a
     spontaneous appearance, which explanation had held
       1
        Les Grands ProbUmes Midicaux, p. 60.
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49