Page 27 - Ethel D. Hume - Bešam ili Paster: Izgubljeno poglavlje u istoriji biologije
P. 27

BfiCHAMP OR PASTEUR?
        24
        there of Dean of the Free Faculty of Medicine.  Some
        wise friends advised him not to leave Montpellier; but, on
        the other side, he was bombarded with entreaties to take
        up work at Lille.  Finally, and entirely from patriotic
      ^motives, he allowed himself to be persuaded to leave his
        clear  University of Montpellier, teeming with happy
        memories of successful work. His altruistic wish to benefit
        at one and the same time France and science brought
        about his acquiescence in the change. He moved to the
        North with his son Joseph, the latter having been ap-
        pointed Professor of Toxicology at Lille.
         All might have gone well had it not been for the clerical
        Directors of the house of learning, whose want of faith was
       well advertised by their intellectual timidity. Like all who
       fence in belief with dogma—and religious priesthoods are
       by no means the only builders of such enclosures—the
       anxious ecclesiastics were determined to set boundaries to
       science and keep thought within barriers. The inevitable
       result was continual friction between the clerical Directors
       and the lay Professors of the University.
          Unfortunately,  IJechamp  entered  this  unpropitious
       atmosphere just at the moment when he was putting the
       finishing touches to his exposition of the microzymas, that
       is, the  infinitesimal  cellular granules, now known  as
       microsomes, which he considered to be the formative
       agents ofthe cells which compose all animal and vegetable
               This stupendous conception of the processes of
       forms £
        Creation at once raised a note of protest from the narrow-
       minded clerics. Here was a man who dared to profess to
       describe  Nature's  methods,  instead  of complacently
       resigning them to mystery.
          Pasteur seems never to have fallen foul of the ecclesi-
       astics; partly, perhaps, because he did not come into the
       same close contact; but more probably because, with his
       worldly wisdom, he was content to profess leadership in
       science and discipleship in religion; besides, had he not
       also gained the patronage of the great? Bechamp's deep
       insight had taught him the connection between science
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32