Page 137 - Ethel D. Hume - Bešam ili Paster: Izgubljeno poglavlje u istoriji biologije
P. 137

134         BECHAMP OR PASTEUR?
          elbow.  There was a compound comminuted fracture of
         the articular joints of the forepart of the arm ; the elbow
         was largely open.  Amputation was imperative and was
         performed between seven and eight hours after the acci-
          dent.  Immediately the amputated arm was carried to
         Dr.  Estor's  laboratory, where he and Dr. Bechamp
         examined it. The forearm presented a dry black surface.
          Complete insensibility had set in before the operation.
         All the symptoms of gangrene were present.   Under a
         high power of the microscope, microzymas were seen
         associated and in chaplets, but no actual bacteria. These
         were merely in process offormation. The changes brought
         about by the injury had progressed too rapidly to give
         them time to develop.  This evidence against bacteria as
         the origin of the mortification was so convincing that
         Professor Estor at once exclaimed: "Bacteria cannot be
         the cause of gangrene; they are the effects of it."
           Here was the outstanding difference between the micro-
         zymian theory and its microbian version, which Pasteur
         and his followers were to be instrumental in promulgating.
         Pasteur seems to have lacked an understanding of the
         basic elements of living matter.  In life he compared the
                                              1
         body to a barrel of beer or a cask ofwine. To him, it only
         appeared an inert collection of chemical compounds; and,
         therefore, naturally, after death, he recognised nothing
         living in  it.  Consequently, when  life incontrovertibly
         appeared, he could only account for it by the invasion
         from without of those minute air-borne organisms, whose
         reality Bechamp had taught him to understand. But the
         explanation of their origin from the cells and tissues of
         plant and animal forms took him considerably longer to
         fathom, though, as we shall see, he eventually actually
         made an unsuccessful attempt to plagiarise Bechamp 's
         point of view.
           Bechamp and Estor, meanwhile, steadily persevered
         with their clinical observations and made a special study,
         for instance, of microzymian development in cases of
          1  See pp. 79, 8o.
   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142